![]() on the bright side, migrating to aurora from an existing database instance is just a matter of a few clicks. so for example, you’d not be able to use a local version for testing and would have to completely rely on aws instances. in that sense, we’re promised that aurora would act like mysql if it was optimized to run on aws from day 1.Ī side effect of this makes aurora available only on aws. seems like a new database was required to make it easier for amazon to further optimize performance and add features like backups and autoscaling database storage – which is not available on the basic mysql instances. Unlike hosting a database on rds, where we have additional performance benefits over ec2, monitoring, and quick installation features, aurora even has some newer tricks up its sleeve. Why amazon is building a new mysql compliant database? To see a previous speed test we ran and discover how each of the regions compare to each other, you can New post: benchmarking aurora vs mysql: is amazon’s new db really 5x faster? fully compatible with any operation you’d run through mysql so no code changes are needed. if now we’re used to using ec2 for our servers, and rds was introduced for optimized database instances, aurora is the next step in this offering. ![]() Replaces logging in production jvms and lets you see the variable state that caused each log error and exception.Īurora is basically the next stage in the evolution of amazon’s hosted services. currently available on three aws regions (virginia, oregon and ireland) on top of rds, amazon’s relational database service. , aurora is amazon’s home grown mysql compatible database. To see how it fares against mysql and if it delivers on the promise of a 5x performance boost. In this post we’re taking a closer look at
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |